y2k mini dress Vintage Y2K Denim Dress
SKU: 85129555234
y2k mini dress

y2k mini dress Vintage Y2K Denim Dress

Sale price$23.16 Regular price$25.73
Save 10%
Size: 4

Pay in installments of $6.43 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 2 - Jul 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

y2k mini dress Vintage Y2K Denim DressThis vintage Y2K denim dress combines a structured strapless bodice, washed denim finish, oversized belt accents, and a pleated mini hem for a look that feels sharp, directional, and instantly styled. The fitted upper silhouette gives the piece a more sculpted shape, while the pleated skirt keeps the overall look playful and dynamic instead of overly rigid. It is the kind of dress that turns a simple outfit into a full fashion statement with very

This vintage Y2K denim dress combines a structured strapless bodice, washed denim finish, oversized belt accents, and a pleated mini hem for a look that feels sharp, directional, and instantly styled. The fitted upper silhouette gives the piece a more sculpted shape, while the pleated skirt keeps the overall look playful and dynamic instead of overly rigid. It is the kind of dress that turns a simple outfit into a full fashion statement with very little extra work, which is refreshing given how committed people are to making dressing harder than necessary.

💖 Why You’ll Love It

🖤 Strapless fitted bodice that creates a strong statement silhouette

The structured strapless upper half gives this dress a much sharper shape than a softer casual denim mini. It frames the shoulders and neckline cleanly, which makes the whole look feel more fashion-led from the start. That fitted bodice also creates a stronger contrast against the pleated lower half, helping the dress read clearly from a distance. It is a strong option for shoppers who want one piece to do most of the styling work on its own.

✨ Washed denim finish that adds vintage character

The lighter washed denim gives the dress a more worn-in Y2K feel than a darker or cleaner denim would. This makes the piece feel more lived-in and visually textured without losing the sharpness of the silhouette. Because the wash already adds character, the outfit feels more complete even before accessories are added. That gives the dress more visual payoff than a flat basic fabric finish.

🖤 Oversized belt details that bring structure and edge

The bold belt accents across the bust and hip area create stronger visual contrast and make the dress feel more styled than a standard strapless mini. These details break up the denim body in a way that adds dimension and gives the piece a more directional streetwear finish. They also help reinforce the waist and silhouette without relying on unnecessary extra styling. That makes the dress feel more defined and much more memorable.

✨ Pleated mini skirt that adds movement and balance

The pleated hem softens the stronger bodice and belt construction by giving the lower half more motion and shape. This keeps the dress from feeling too stiff or overly severe, especially when styled with boots, heels, or a shorter jacket. The fuller movement also helps the piece photograph well and feel more dynamic in motion. It creates a balanced silhouette that feels bold without becoming visually heavy.

🖤 One-piece styling solution with major outfit payoff

Some dresses need layers, belts, and too many add-ons to feel complete, but this one already carries enough structure and visual interest to stand on its own. That means you can keep the rest of the styling more focused and still get a full result. It works especially well when you want to look highly styled without spending an hour pretending indecision is a creative process. It is dramatic, wearable, and genuinely useful for statement dressing.

👗 Outfit Aesthetic

Y2K strapless denim dress for early-2000s inspired going-out styling

This dress fits naturally into Y2K fashion because of its strapless neckline, washed denim finish, mini length, and bold hardware-inspired belt details. It works especially well with boots, slimmer jackets, smaller bags, and statement accessories that support a more recognizable early-2000s silhouette. The result feels nostalgic, but still sharp enough for current fashion styling. For shoppers building a Y2K-focused wardrobe, this is a clear statement piece.

Grunge inspired mini dress for darker contrast-driven looks

The washed denim body paired with the oversized black belt accents also gives this piece a grunge-inspired direction that feels especially strong with darker footwear and more rugged outerwear. It has enough edge to work with distressed textures, leather jackets, or heavier accessories without losing the shape of the dress. Because the structure remains clean, the final look still feels polished rather than messy. That makes it useful for shoppers who want grunge influence with stronger visual control.

Edgy feminine partywear with a more structured silhouette

This piece also works naturally as edgy feminine partywear because it balances a body-skimming strapless top with a shorter pleated skirt. The overall shape feels bold and confident, but the skirt keeps the look from becoming too severe. Styled with heels or boots, it moves easily into a stronger evening direction. That makes it practical for parties and going-out looks where more presence matters.

Streetwear inspired denim mini dress for fashion-led city styling

The bold hardware look of the belts and the structured denim body also push this dress into a streetwear-leaning fashion category, especially when paired with a cropped jacket and stronger boots. It feels more directional than a soft denim dress and much more visually clear than a plain mini. That gives it strong city-style appeal for shoppers who like statement outfits that still feel current. It reads as intentional from every angle.

Vintage inspired washed denim dress with modern contrast detail

The denim wash gives the piece a vintage-inspired finish, while the exaggerated strapless construction and bold belt placement keep the styling modern. This mix helps the dress feel trend-aware without looking overly futuristic or too costume-driven. It works especially well for shoppers who want a piece with retro influence but contemporary fashion structure. That balance gives it much stronger long-term styling appeal.

🧵 Material & Details

This dress is made from denim, giving it a more structured feel that supports the fitted strapless bodice and the shape of the pleated mini skirt. The fabric appears substantial enough to hold the silhouette cleanly through the body without collapsing, which is important for a dress built around stronger contrast and visible structure. The washed finish softens the overall look and gives it more vintage-inspired texture while still keeping the piece fashion-forward. It feels bold and shaped rather than soft or fluid.

Material: Denim

Color: Washed blue denim with black contrast belt detail

Includes: 1 dress

📏 Sizes & Fit Details

Available sizes: S, M, L

S: Bust 29.1 in (74 cm), Waist 27.6 in (70 cm), Hips 33.1 in (84 cm), Length 22.0 in (56 cm)

M: Bust 30.7 in (78 cm), Waist 29.1 in (74 cm), Hips 34.6 in (88 cm), Length 22.4 in (57 cm)

L: Bust 32.3 in (82 cm), Waist 30.7 in (78 cm), Hips 36.2 in (92 cm), Length 22.8 in (58 cm)

This denim mini dress is designed with a more fitted bodice and hip area for a defined silhouette, while the pleated lower section adds shape and movement. If you are choosing between sizes, comparing bust, waist, and hip measurements will help you decide whether you want a closer structured fit or a slightly easier feel through the body.

🧺 Care Instructions

Wash gently in cold water with similar colors to help maintain the denim wash, overall structure, and contrast belt detailing. Because the silhouette depends on the shape of the bodice and pleated lower section, gentler handling can help the dress continue to sit cleanly through the body over time. Avoid harsh bleach and strong heat, and lay flat or hang to dry for the best result. Use low heat only if needed.

For storage, hang the dress in a way that supports the strapless bodice and helps the pleated hem stay smooth between wears. Gentle care will help preserve the structure that gives the dress its strongest visual impact.

🎀 Perfect For

Going-out outfit styling with boots, heels, or a cropped jacket

This dress is a strong option for shoppers who want a going-out look with much more personality than a basic bodycon mini. The strapless bodice and oversized belt detail already create a strong silhouette, which means the rest of the styling can stay focused and controlled. It works especially well with boots, heels, or a shorter jacket that keeps the waist and hip structure visible. That makes it practical for parties, nightlife, and more styled weekend looks.

Y2K fashion looks with a bolder denim statement piece

If your wardrobe leans toward early-2000s silhouettes, washed denim, stronger belts, and statement mini dresses, this piece fits in immediately. The shape feels compact and fashion-led, while the denim keeps the look grounded enough to style repeatedly. Because the design already has enough edge, you do not need to overload the rest of the outfit to get a clear result. That makes it especially useful for shoppers who want a louder Y2K piece that still feels wearable.

Fashion-led city dressing where the dress needs to carry the look

This piece works especially well for city looks where one stronger garment is meant to anchor the entire outfit. The contrast between the structured bodice, pleated hem, and bold belts gives the dress enough presence to lead without requiring much extra styling. That makes it useful for street-style dressing, travel fashion moments, and more curated off-duty looks. It does the work of several separate styling decisions without asking you to assemble them manually like some kind of emotional flat-pack furniture.

Concerts and styled photo moments with stronger visual structure

The shape and detail of this dress make it especially effective for concerts, social content, and styled photos where silhouette matters clearly on camera. The belts create contrast, the denim wash adds texture, and the pleated hem gives the lower half more movement so the outfit reads strongly from different angles. That makes it a useful option for occasions where a standard mini dress would feel too flat. It is built to register visually without becoming chaotic.

Giftable statement dress for shoppers who love edgy Y2K fashion

This dress also works as a gift because it feels far more distinctive than a standard denim mini while still staying inside a very clear fashion category. The washed finish, strapless construction, and bold belt details give it immediate personality, but the denim base keeps it understandable and wearable. It suits shoppers drawn to Y2K fashion, grunge-inspired streetwear, edgy feminine partywear, and fashion-led denim silhouettes. As a gift, it feels memorable, high-impact, and genuinely special.

✨ Styling Ideas

🖤 Pair it with a cropped leather jacket for a sharper grunge look

A cropped leather or distressed jacket works especially well with this dress because it reinforces the contrast and edge without hiding the structure of the bodice and hip details. This helps the whole outfit feel more grounded and directional for city styling or evening looks. The jacket adds texture while keeping the silhouette visible. It is a strong option when you want the look to feel bolder without adding clutter.

✨ Wear it with knee-high boots for a stronger Y2K finish

Knee-high or mid-calf boots pair naturally with the strapless denim mini because they extend the silhouette and support the more dramatic early-2000s direction. This styling choice helps the dress feel even more intentional for parties, night looks, and street-style dressing. Because the dress already has enough visual structure, the boots can stay clean and simple. The final result feels sharp and controlled.

🖤 Keep jewelry focused so the neckline stays clean

The strapless neckline already creates a strong upper-body line, so the styling often works best with one focused necklace or cleaner jewelry instead of heavy layering. This keeps the neckline visible and helps the dress remain the central statement piece. A single choker or short necklace is usually enough to complete the upper half. The dress does not need a committee of accessories shouting over it.

✨ Let the dress stay central by keeping the rest of the outfit selective

This is the kind of piece that already carries a full look through shape, denim texture, and belt detail, so the accessories work best when they stay relatively controlled. One bag, one shoe direction, and a small amount of jewelry are usually enough to complete the outfit. That keeps the final result more polished and makes the dress easier to repeat across different occasions. A strong dress should lead the styling, not enter combat with every item around it.

🖤 Use outerwear and shoes to shift the mood from streetwear to partywear

One of the easiest ways to change the direction of this piece is through what you layer over it and what you wear on your feet. A distressed jacket and boots can make it feel more grunge and streetwear-led, while cleaner heels or sleeker outerwear can move it toward party dressing. This gives the dress more versatility than it first appears to have. It lets you change the mood without needing an entirely different outfit.

This vintage Y2K denim dress is a strong choice for shoppers who want a mini dress with far more presence than a standard strapless silhouette. With its washed denim finish, structured bodice, oversized belt accents, and pleated hem, it brings contrast, attitude, and real styling payoff into one bold piece.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 85129555234

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell y2k mini dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 618 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Katrina
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
A Very Well Written and Entertaining Novel
Format: Paperback
Have you ever wondered what it would be like if your whole life was planned. You didn't get to cheese who you got married two and had to live the same as everyone. The government only allows the people to have access to 100 paintings, books, pieces of music. And other sources of art. People in the book matched by Allyson Condie must all live the same, eat the same, and get Matched with someone which whom they will marry. But Cassia is matched with two people. As I said Seventeen year-old Cassia lives in a futuristic, dystopian society where the citizens' lives are strictly controlled by the government. At the age of seventeen, citizens undergo a process known as "matching" which means being paired up with another boy or girl selected by the government. She ends up being matched with her best friend, Xander, and is at first excited about their future together. However, when she's at home viewing her micro card on the port, something flashes and a familiar face pops up on the screen, its Ky Markham, another friend of Cassia's. She is confused because she was matched with Xander and Ky who is an aberration. An aberration is someone who will never be matched. Cassia soon starts to fall in love with Ky during her summer leisure. Throughout the book Cassia is forced to try and forget about the image of Ky on the port and focus on her true match Xander. But, that is difficult for Cassia knowing someone else could be her match too. Throughout the novel Cassia has to face choices and rebellion against the officials which makes life even harder. This book was amazing, I highly recommend it. There were points in the book that make you really have to think. Also I am glad that Cassia is standing up for what she believes in and is not just going with the flow. It’s important to stand out and express how you really feel. This book does a great job in keeping readers entertained. I often found myself saying over and over “one more chapter”. I have not yet read the next two books but an extremely excited to start them. Allyson’s way of writing just seems to be so descriptive. If you ever need a Dystopian Future book to read this is the one. It’s filled with everything, action, suspense, romance, and rebellion. Just think if you were put in Cassia’s shoes or just even in the society what would you do differently, or the same and why. And if anyone is debating to read this book you defiantly should, everything is great about this book, the beautiful writing by Allyson, the plot, and the character depth. Thank you for reading this and I hope I inspired you to buy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2014
C
Verified Purchase
C. Graciela
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 3
Soooooo slow-pacing
Format: Paperback
I personally do not know what the Entertainment Weekly critics read when they said this was "the hottest YA title to hit bookstores since The Hunger Games". Maybe they didnt read The Hunger Games. Because saying that is a pretty terrible insult to Suzzanne Collins, since the Hunger Games is freaking amazing, and this book is most certainly not. Beware, there might be some spoilers ahead. This book had a lot of problems, at least for me. It wasnt terrible, you can finish it, and it may leave you with some interesting things to keep in mind, but that is it. It is not totally enjoyable, since on some parts you have to fight to keep reading, not completely intriguing, or thought provoking, or even innovative. This book tells us the story of a seventeen-year-old girl named Cassia, who lives in The Society. Thie Society is a dystopian world which is strictly controled by Officials: they determine who you marry, when you marry, when you have kids, how many do you have, etc. They monitor your dreams, and have you doing the exact amount of exercise and eating the exact food you need in order to mantain a healthy body. Their main goal is to make your life span really long and to improve the human`s genetic pool. In order to achieve that The Society controls EVERYTHING. They even determine they day of your death, which is the day of your 80th birthday. When teenagers turn 17 they have to attend their "Match Banquet", the event in which every girl will be assigned to their "perfect" boy match, according to the system, with whom they will have to marry when they turn 21, and then have kids with at 24. Cassia is extremely excited on the day of her Match Banquet, and is astonished when she finds out that she has been matched to her best friend, Xander. She receives a microcard with all his information, although she already knows everything about him, but when she opens the microcard on the day after the Banquet, Xander`s face appears rapidly on the creen and then vanishes. A picture of another boy appears instead. The face of Ky Markham. Cassia is totally confused and doesnt know what to do. And from there the story develops. The misunderstanding woth the microcard transforms into much more, and of course, our "heroine" (if you can even call her that) ends up doubting about her world and how controlling it is. As I said before, I had some problems with this book. First, its EXTREMELY slow-pacing. I think that for the first interesting thing to happen (besides they whole Ky`s-face-on-the-microcard thing that you already know from the begginging since its said in the back of the book) you have to read like 160 pages(no, Im not kidding). There are, easily, 150 pages scattered through the book that are exclusively about Cassia thinking of Ky`s eyes, or Ky`s words, or what is his story; that sort of thing. Questions like "Does he care for me?", "When did he see me?", "Oh, I want to kiss him so bad" are constantly present throughout the book. I really think this novel should have entire chapters cut off. They dont have a purpose to be there at all. Another thing related to this is that, as we all well know, the whole love-triangle thing is being used in an over-the-top way these days. The love triangle between Cassia, Xander and Ky seems to be the only story-line for at least three quarters of this book, so I should say Ally Condie wasnt very innovative. Besides, I should say that I didnt connect to ANY of the characters. Cassia was heavily annoying at times, and slightly annoying every other time. She didnt seem to have a very strong personality, and her convictions seemed to waver often. In the end she sticks to a certain way of thinking, but the path she chooses shows that she is really not a very intelligent girl. Related to that is the fact that she was constantly having questions pop in her mind from her personal experiences and she would connect them to universal questions in a bold way, ALL THE TIME. It seemed she was a 12 year old just discovering the world, and not an almost-adult person. I can understand that because of the sheltered way she was raised, but it only made me feel mad. Was the author trying to make her sound smart?? I dont know. I didnt connect to her in the least. Xander was a total sweety, but really, we dont get to know him that much. I think he would be a fantastic character to explore (maybe on book 2?). I didnt connect to him either, but I found myself thinking "Why does this have to happen to him? Poor guy. He gets the crazy girl who wants to ruin The Society for a stupid love. Ugh. He just wanted his perfect match". I know The Society is bad and everything, but the poor guy just wanted to be left alone and live happily, and she had to go and decide that after all, she didnt want the society she had wanted until the day before. Ky was OK, but really, his whole love story with Cassia was a little cheesy and unrealistic. And as Cassia spent great portions of the book talking about HIM, and how he IS, and what he DOES, and etc. you kind of feel bothered by his presence in the end. Its tiring after a while. I would also like to add that the world needs to be more defined on the next book, at least for me. How did we arrive at this world? Where is it geographically? In the United States? Cassia mentions the "Outer Provinces" and, farther away from them, the "Other Countries". What are the "Other Countries"? The countries that exist nowadays or are there other countries that have developed similar systems as The Society?? This book is OK, it has good things, you dont end up thinking you have completely lost your time, but it has some major flaws that I hope are adressed on the second book. I think I`ll probably give it a try when I have time, but Im not super intrigued, or anything of the sort.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2011
P
Verified Purchase
P. Blevins
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Interesting view of the future.
Format: Kindle
Matched by Ally Condie. This is a science fiction that is futuristic. It is suitable for junior high students to read and would be a great series for them after the Divergent series and the Hunger Games. The characters are very realistic. Cassia is anxious to attend her Matching Ceremony. She will know who her husband will be or at least who the person is who best fits her. She will then get to know this person over the ports. At seventeen, she is also waiting to find out what her work assignment will be. She is a sorted and is making great strides in this field. She steps out to the Matching Ceremony with her Mother and Father in a beautiful green dress. This is one of the only times she will wear a color other than black or brown and she makes the most of it. She carries an artifact with her, a compact that her Grandfather had given her. She feels so grown up and nervous. Something surprising happens at the Matching ceremony, she is matched with her best friend Xander. It is very unusual for a match to be made with someone you know; but she is thrilled as is Xander. They know each other quite well. Now it will simply be raised to a different degree. She does look at the microchip that they give her in the silver box. It has all the information she would need to know about her match. However, when she first looks at it, Xander disappears and Ky Markham appears. Then, Xander reappears. The Official assigned to her convinces her that her microchip was defective She believes this because she had learned that Ky was an Abberation and would not be matched with anyone. This mistake on the part of the Matching Team, causes Cassia to start paying more attention to Ky. He had been a member of their group since he arrived; but he didn’t engage with anyone well. Now, he seems to be part of the group and accepted by all. He and Cassia are both in the hiking group and begin to get to know each other better. What lies ahead for Xander, Cassia, and Ky? What does the Officials have in mind for them? How are her parents involved? Once Cassia starts breaking the rules, things get complicated. I can hardly wait to read Crossed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2015
K
Verified Purchase
Kayla
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Guilty pleasure
Format: Kindle
- MINOR SPOILERS - First, let me say I'm definitely past the target audience's age. So for me, this was more of some idle mind candy than anything else, and as that's exactly what i got, I quite enjoyed it. I finished it all in one go, so it was interesting enough to hold my interest start to finish. I'm not going to say the plot or characters were mind-blowing or original, but I found Cassia likable and didn't get the same amount of Mary Sue/self-insertion feel as from some other YA lit. I have to admit to having a bit of a crush on Ky, who's smart enough not to want to seem smart. And I am a COMPLETE sucker for love triangles, especially when it's not so clear-cut, like "this guy is horrible to her and this guy is perfect," because where's the dilemma in that? Xander and Ky are both good people who genuinely care about Cassia, and she cares for both of them in turn. I might have liked to learn more about some of her friends. We get to know her family very well, but the book seems to indicate that she has strong bonds with her friends as well. And this is the time in their life when they're beginning to go their separate ways, graduating from school and moving on to careers, so I think there were some missed opportunities there. I'm not a huge fan of books that are specifically written to be series (like the cliffhanger ending here). I'm of the mindset that at least the first book in a series should be able to stand on its own without throwing it in the reader's face that, hey, there's more to read so make sure to buy the next book! I don't mind if a story concludes without having answered all my questions, but ending on a question mark is different from ending on an ellipsis, if that makes sense. As far as the dystopian part goes, once again nothing about it really stuck out to me. There are some interesting ideas in here, like the pills and the Banquets and such. Probably some readers will want to have learned more about the world and heard less about the romance, but I'm a romantic at heart. I also find lengthy world-building passages to be a little self-indulgent and irritating; I'd prefer for the world to unfold bit by bit; and I acknowledge the pace at which it does this will probably be too slow for some. This isn't a high-octane adventure story like The Hunger Games or Divergent. I get the sense that the following two books might be more in that vein, though. I've started on Crossed and, depending on how well I like it, I will probably finish the series. Overall, this is an enjoyable read, but don't go in expecting to be blown away. Nothing about it makes it stand out from the dozens of other dystopian teen lit stories out there. I don't think it'd be fair for me to guess how teen audiences will receive it, as I read virtually no YA lit besides this latest interest. But older readers can still get an afternoon of light reading out of it. And if nothing else, it can be a topic of conversation with younger siblings or children. 3.5/5
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2014
E
Verified Purchase
Emily Coleman
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Beautifully written dystopia with a softer edge than The Hunger Games
Format: Hardcover
I've had this book sitting on my shelf for quite some time. I started it back in July. I had just finished re-reading and in preparation for . About a quarter of the way through the book I stopped reading. I realized that I was reading it with a violent-out-to-get-you-government filter. And Matched just wasn't doing it for me. So, I put it away for awhile to get in the mood. (I think also some of the hype was getting to me, and there was no way it was going to live up to it). So, during the Christmas/New Years break that I had from work, I picked it up again. And I absolutely loved it. It was different than The Hunger Games series in that it isn't nearly as brutal or bloody. As with most dystopian novels, Cassia's Society is all about control. However, The Society has created an illusion that through their control everyone is living at their highest potential. There is never a need for fear or sadness because everything is so strictly monitored. Their world is not cluttered with information because their books, movies, and songs are carefully selected. Citizen's food is given in specific portions and with nutritional value to optimize the health of every person. And, of course, matches are selected based on the compatibility of each party for maximized happiness. Is Cassia's Society so different from our own? In our efforts to create a healthy society have we overstepped our bounds? I'm thinking of recent lawsuits against McDonalds for causing obesity. Or the laws passed in recent years to ban trans fats from restaurants in California and New York. While I obviously feel that eating healthy is important, at what point do we take away individual freedom and responsibility because "we know better"? One of my favorite parts of the book comes when Cassia realizes that the world in which she lives no longer values creation. Quoting from my uncorrected proof copy: "Standing there looking at my work, however, I realize that all my family has ever done is sort. Never create. My father sorts old artifacts like my grandfather did; my great-grandmother sorted poems. My farmlander grandparents plant seeds and tend crops, but everything they grow has been assigned by the Officials. Just like the things my mother grows at the Aboretum." Now, I've never been one for poetry. I don't know that I have the type of mind that can truly appreciate it. However, I do love music, and books, and the ability that I have to speak my mind however I wish. Without belaboring the point, this book gave me quite a bit to think about. I know many people will like the book for the romance. Frankly, both boys are a great fit for Cassia in different ways, so the love triangle really isn't about pitting one against the other (a la Twilight). Cassia's parents are pretty flat, as are her friends. We don't really get much into the heads of other characters besides Cassia and Xander. I am not entirely sure if that was intentional to show that over time people have really become devoid of original thought. Therefore, count me among the many that will be eagerly awaiting Crossed when it comes out in November.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2011

recommand products